 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Publications
News
February 18, 2013
Jeffrey Vesely Discusses Reasonable Alternative Apportionment
Jeffrey Vesely Discusses Reasonable Alternative Apportionment
November 13, 2012
Jeffrey Vesely and Craig Becker Discuss New Gross Receipts Tax
Jeffrey Vesely and Craig Becker Discuss New Gross Receipts Tax
November 22, 2011
Pillsbury Helps Archdiocese of San Francisco Defeat Unwarranted $22 Million Tax Assessment Targeting Church’s Reorganization
Pillsbury Helps Archdiocese of San Francisco Defeat Unwarranted $22 Million Tax Assessment Targeting Church’s Reorganization
Events
San Francisco
|
Four Embarcadero Center 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5998 |
|
| Tel. | +1.415.983.1075 |
| Fax. | +1.415.983.1200 |
Professionals
 |
Jeffrey M. Vesely
|
6/5/2012
California Tax Board Provides Guidance on the Broadened Definition of ‘Retailer Engaged in Business in This State’
Authors: Annie H. Huang, Jeffrey M. Vesely, Paul T. Casas
On May 30, 2012, the State Board of Equalization (“SBE”), approved pro-posed amendments to the California Code of Regulations, Title 18, section 1684 (“Proposed Regulation”). The Proposed Regulation attempts to provide guidance as to the meaning of the broadened statutory definition of “retailers engaged in business in this state.” The statutory definition now includes retailers who are members of “commonly controlled groups,” as well as retailers who enter into agreements with “a person or persons in this state” who meet certain minimum thresholds.
California Tax Board Provides Guidance on the Broadened Definition of ‘Retailer Engaged in Business in This State’
Authors: Annie H. Huang, Jeffrey M. Vesely, Paul T. Casas
On May 30, 2012, the State Board of Equalization (“SBE”), approved pro-posed amendments to the California Code of Regulations, Title 18, section 1684 (“Proposed Regulation”). The Proposed Regulation attempts to provide guidance as to the meaning of the broadened statutory definition of “retailers engaged in business in this state.” The statutory definition now includes retailers who are members of “commonly controlled groups,” as well as retailers who enter into agreements with “a person or persons in this state” who meet certain minimum thresholds.
10/19/2010
Tax Provisions of the 2010-2011 California Budget
Authors: Michael J. Cataldo, Annie H. Huang, Kerne H. O. Matsubara, Jeffrey M. Vesely
California has enacted a budget for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. The income and franchise tax provisions of the budget provided in Senate Bill ("SB") 858, expected to be signed by the Governor, extend the suspension of net operating loss deductions, relax the 20-percent corporate understatement penalty, and remove recently enacted market-based sourcing rules for taxpayers that do not elect the single sales factor method of apportionment.
Tax Provisions of the 2010-2011 California Budget
Authors: Michael J. Cataldo, Annie H. Huang, Kerne H. O. Matsubara, Jeffrey M. Vesely
California has enacted a budget for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. The income and franchise tax provisions of the budget provided in Senate Bill ("SB") 858, expected to be signed by the Governor, extend the suspension of net operating loss deductions, relax the 20-percent corporate understatement penalty, and remove recently enacted market-based sourcing rules for taxpayers that do not elect the single sales factor method of apportionment.
9/7/2010
New Jersey Tax Court Decides in Favor of Taxpayer in First Interest Addback Case
Authors: Jeffrey M. Vesely, Annie H. Huang
On August 31, 2010, the New Jersey Tax Court issued a memorandum decision in Beneficial New Jersey, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation,1 concluding that the taxpayer satisfied one of the enumerated exceptions to the interest addback statute under N.J.S.A. 54:10A-4(k)(2)(I), and was thus entitled to its interest expense deductions.
New Jersey Tax Court Decides in Favor of Taxpayer in First Interest Addback Case
Authors: Jeffrey M. Vesely, Annie H. Huang
On August 31, 2010, the New Jersey Tax Court issued a memorandum decision in Beneficial New Jersey, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation,1 concluding that the taxpayer satisfied one of the enumerated exceptions to the interest addback statute under N.J.S.A. 54:10A-4(k)(2)(I), and was thus entitled to its interest expense deductions.
11/18/2005
Franchise Tax Board's Attempt to Apply Expense Attribution is Soundly Rejected
Authors: Jeffrey M. Vesely, Annie H. Huang
Franchise Tax Board's Attempt to Apply Expense Attribution is Soundly Rejected
Authors: Jeffrey M. Vesely, Annie H. Huang
12/28/2004
California Tax Amnesty . . . Not?
Authors: Annie H. Huang, Kerne H. O. Matsubara, Richard E. Nielsen, Jeffrey M. Vesely
California Tax Amnesty . . . Not?
Authors: Annie H. Huang, Kerne H. O. Matsubara, Richard E. Nielsen, Jeffrey M. Vesely
