Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...

We have updated our Cookie Policy to reflect changes in the law on cookies used on websites in Europe. This website uses cookies to maximize your experience and help us to understand how we can improve it. To find out more click here.

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of data which are downloaded to your computer, or other device, when you visit a website. Cookies allow us to recognize your computer and improve your experience on our website. Some cookies are also necessary for the technical operation of our website. Please read our Cookie Policy which provides important information about the cookies we use, how we use them and how they can be deleted. Please remember that deleting cookies may affect your experience of our website.

Show less.

Accept and hide this message
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury
Pillsbury
Email Page Print Friendly Version Text Size Subscribe
Spotlight
    Crisis Management Resource Center
    Kenneth Quinn Crisis Management Video

    Professionals

    Kenneth P. Quinn

    Kenneth P. Quinn
    Partner

    T: +1.202.663.8898 F: +1.202.663.8007
    Email  |  Download vCard  | 
    11/19/2014
    Huerta v. Pirker: NTSB Rules that UAS Are “Aircraft” and Subject to FAA Prohibition on Careless and Reckless Operations
    Authors: Kenneth P. Quinn, Jennifer E. Trock, Benjamin M. Berlin, Graham C. Keithley
    On November 18, 2014, in a unanimous decision, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) concluded that unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) are: (1) “aircraft” within the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) statutory and regulatory definitions; and (2) prohibited from operation in a careless and reckless manner under FAA regulations. The decision represents a significant win for the FAA in its attempts to prohibit unlawful UAS operations, and a setback for commercial interests that were hoping to turn the Pirker battle into a broader war against the FAA’s ban on commercial use of UAS. The opinion reverses an NTSB Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision earlier this year that the UAS Pirker commercially operated was a “model aircraft” beyond the FAA’s authority.
    9/26/14
    FAA Grants Exemptions and Releases Guidance for Operation of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    Authors: Kenneth P. Quinn, Jennifer E. Trock, Graham C. Keithley
    On September 25, 2014, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved six exemption requests for the use of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) for television and movie filmmaking under strict conditions. Simultaneously, the FAA released guidelines for petitioners seeking FAA exemption approval to operate sUAS in the National Airspace System (NAS). The FAA’s exemptions and guidance serve as useful relief valves to address pent-up demand for commercial UAS, with 40 exemption requests in the pipeline, many of which are now likely to be granted in modified forms in the coming months, especially in the agricultural, chemical, university research, and utilities sectors. These latest exemptions are highly restrictive, and do not represent a comprehensive regulatory framework to address the many safety, privacy, and security issues raised by the widespread use of UAS. FAA, which has neither expertise nor authority regarding privacy, is expected to issue a more comprehensive, proposed rulemaking for sUAS before the end of the year.
    3/6/2014
    India’s Aviation Safety Rating Downgrade Could Have Cascading Effects
    Authors: Stephen B. Huttler, Jennifer E. Trock, Moushami P. Joshi, Kenneth P. Quinn, Sanjay Jose Mullick
    On January 31, 2014, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) downgraded India’s aviation safety rating to Category 2 under the FAA’s International Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA) program – a program designed to ensure safety oversight by foreign aviation authorities in accordance with applicable International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards and recommended practices. FAA's foreign assessment program focuses on a country’s ability, not the individual air carrier’s, to adhere to ICAO’s standards and recommended practices for aircraft operations and maintenance, largely under Annex 6 of the Chicago Convention. The downgrade, which came after years of consultations with the FAA, serves as a stark reminder to governments undergoing IASA and ICAO reviews to promptly and comprehensively address concerns before their status is downgraded.
    1/29/2014
    DC Circuit Affirms Crucial FAA No Hazard Determination for Cape Wind Project
    Authors: Kenneth P. Quinn, Jennifer E. Trock, Osama E. Hamdy
    On January 22, 2014, the DC Circuit upheld the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) 2012 determination of no hazard, clearing the final FAA hurdle to construction of the 130-wind turbine Cape Wind project in Nantucket Sound.
    9/27/2012
    Foreign Airlines Permitted to Hold Equity Stakes in Indian Carriers
    Authors: Stephen B. Huttler, Kenneth P. Quinn, Jennifer E. Trock, Sonakshi Jha
    On September 20, 2012, the Government of India notified the public that it has undertaken a series of reforms relating to foreign investments in the country, including allowing foreign airlines to hold up to 49 percent foreign direct investment ("FDI") in Indian airlines. This decision, coupled with significant cuts on the taxes on overseas corporate borrowers, may lure foreign investors toward India, although Indian airlines face formidable financial pressures. The move comes at a time of renewed focus on liberalizing airline ownership laws in the U.S. and Europe.
    11/15/2011
    DOT Moves Forward with Controversial Airline Passenger Protection Rules—Brings First Enforcement Case
    Authors: Kenneth P. Quinn, Jennifer E. Trock
    In the face of significant airline opposition, the U.S. Department of Transportation ("DOT") has introduced a series of new rules designed to enhance passenger rights and "to improve the air travel environment for consumers." The new rules could have profound effects well beyond the immediate need for airlines, airports, and travel agents to make fundamental systems and programming changes, and to train appropriate employees. Prospects for increased DOT enforcement actions loom large on the horizon, especially for extended tarmac delays. Indeed, on November 14, 2011, the Department announced its first fine for alleged violations of its tarmac delay rules. While DOT said the $900,000 fine against American Eagle represents the largest civil penalty to be paid by an airline in a consumer protection case not involving civil rights violations, it was actually significantly less than the maximum possible amount: $16.7 million, with $250,000 credit given for the airline’s travel vouchers and frequent flyer awards to affected passengers.
    10/31/2011
    DC Circuit Vacates Crucial FAA Determinations for Cape Wind Project
    Authors: Jennifer E. Trock, Kenneth P. Quinn
    The DC Circuit has vacated and remanded the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) no hazard determinations for 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound, finding that the FAA failed to follow its own handbook in determining whether the proposed turbines would have a “substantial adverse effect” on air navigation.
    2010
    Improving Global Aviation Safety by Protecting Information Sources
    Source: Aviation L. & Policy 249, 9 Issues, DePaul University College of Law
    Authors: Kenneth P. Quinn, Jennifer E. Trock, Timothy Gerheim
    3/20/2009
    Infrastructure Recovery – Stimulus Investments in the Transportation Sector
    Authors: Jane Wallison Stein, Mark N. Lessard, Kenneth P. Quinn, Jennifer E. Trock, Michael C. Banks
    On February 17, 2008, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the "Act"). The purposes of the $787 billion Act include preserving and creating jobs; promoting economic recovery and assisting those most impacted by the recession; investing in economic efficiency, infrastructure and environmental protection; and stabilizing state and local government budgets. The Act includes significant grants and other assistance for airport, mass transit, highway, rail, transportation security, and other infrastructure projects.
    July 2008
    Preserving the Safety Benefits of Voluntary Disclosure Programs
    Author: Kenneth P. Quinn
    In early 2008, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) initiated enforcement to impose a multimillion dollar civil penalty on an airline for operating planes that were not in compliance with the FAA's Airworthiness Directives. Since then, the FAA has implemented a series of compliance audits on all air carriers. In conjunction with the audits, Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters and FAA Acting Administrator Robert A. Sturgell have commenced a number of initiatives to maintain the industry’s level of air safety. One initiative is the formation of an outside Independent Review Team, which seeks to gather industry information, comments, and craft recommendations regarding the FAA’s implementation of aviation safety system.
    January 2007
    Battling Accident Criminalization
    Source: Aero Safety World
    Author: Kenneth P. Quinn

    Pillsbury
    Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury