Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...

We have updated our Cookie Policy to reflect changes in the law on cookies used on websites in Europe. This website uses cookies to maximize your experience and help us to understand how we can improve it. To find out more click here.

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of data which are downloaded to your computer, or other device, when you visit a website. Cookies allow us to recognize your computer and improve your experience on our website. Some cookies are also necessary for the technical operation of our website. Please read our Cookie Policy which provides important information about the cookies we use, how we use them and how they can be deleted. Please remember that deleting cookies may affect your experience of our website.

Show less.

Accept and hide this message
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury
Pillsbury

Press Contacts

Erik Cummins
Senior Public Relations Manager
Office: +1.415.983.1286
Jaime Bruck
Senior Public Relations Manager
Office: +1.212.858.1051

Related Professional

Related Offices

In the News

Bobby Ghajar Leads Successful Trial on Board Game Trademark Infringement

As mentioned in: Daily Journal, Law360
November 8, 2012

Bobby Ghajar, a partner with Pillsbury’s intellectual property section in Los Angeles, led a successful trial for Spin Master Ltd., which will be awarded $8.6 million in damages for trademark infringement by Zobmondo Entertainment LLC, a board game company, for using the trademark phrase, "Would You Rather…?" for over a decade.

The case, which has worked its way up through federal court to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and back, argued that the difference between whether a trademark is "descriptive" or "suggestive" can be a fine line, which needs to be decided by a jury.

"The jury here heard all of the evidence and they were able to use their common sense and conclude that this is a protectable trademark. This is a suggestive trademark," Ghajar said.

If a trademark is determined to be descriptive, as Zobmondo Entertainment argued, it is invalid.

Ghajar said Zobmondo’s only defense was validity, arguing "Would You Rather…?" was a necessary term to describe such a game.

“They didn’t have the argument that the marks were different. They didn’t have the argument that there was no confusion," Ghajar said. "This was one of very few cases I can think of that made its way through jury when the core issue was validity. The defendant banked on the fact that he could prove to a jury that it was not valid."

Pillsbury
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury