Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...

We have updated our Cookie Policy to reflect changes in the law on cookies used on websites in Europe. This website uses cookies to maximize your experience and help us to understand how we can improve it. To find out more click here.

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of data which are downloaded to your computer, or other device, when you visit a website. Cookies allow us to recognize your computer and improve your experience on our website. Some cookies are also necessary for the technical operation of our website. Please read our Cookie Policy which provides important information about the cookies we use, how we use them and how they can be deleted. Please remember that deleting cookies may affect your experience of our website.

Show less.

Accept and hide this message
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury
Client Alert

Health Care Reform Update: Large Employers Must Offer Health Coverage or Pay Assessment
Authors: Mark Jones, Lori Partrick

Beginning in 2014, large U.S. employers that do not offer a minimum level of affordable health coverage to their full-time employees may be required to pay an assessment of up to $3,000 per employee. For plan years beginning in 2015, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) is proposing to extend this assessment to employers that fail to offer adequate health coverage to the children (up to age 26) of their full-time employees. Proposed “pay or play” regulations released on December 28, 2012 also include rules for determining whether an entity is a “large employer” subject to the shared responsibility requirements, identifying which employees and dependents must be offered coverage, and calculating any payment that may be due.

What Are the Shared Responsibility Payments?

Beginning in 2014, an employer will owe a shared responsibility payment for any month in which it:

  • Offers health coverage to less than 95% of its full-time employees (or their dependents after 2014), and at least one full-time employee receives a premium tax credit to help pay for coverage from a health care exchange; or
  • Offers health coverage that is unaffordable or does not provide minimum value, and at least one full-time employee receives a premium tax credit to help pay for coverage from a health care exchange.

Affordable Coverage. Coverage is considered to be unaffordable for an employee if the employee’s share of the premium would cost more than 9.5% of his or her annual household income. Under the proposed regulations, employers that otherwise provide adequate health coverage to their full-time employees may assume that the health coverage they offer is affordable for purposes of the shared responsibility payment, if the cost of coverage to an employee would not exceed:

  • 9.5% of the wages the employer pays the employee that year, as reported on Form W-2;
  • 9.5% of the employee’s wages (computed for salaried employees using their monthly salary and for hourly employees by multiplying their hourly rate of pay by 130 per month); or
  • 9.5% of the Federal poverty line for a single individual living in the state in which the employee is employed.

Minimum Value. To satisfy the minimum value requirement, a plan’s share of the total allowed cost of benefits must equal or exceed 60% of such costs. In regulations issued last year, the IRS and Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) proposed a minimum value calculator to help sponsors determine whether a plan meets this requirement. As an alternative, a sponsor may compare the plan to a checklist of features to be published by the IRS and HHS. If a plan contains non-standard provisions that are not suitable for the use of the calculator and the plan does not fit the safe harbor checklists, the sponsor may retain an actuary to certify the plan’s minimum value.

To read this publication in its entirety, please click the link in the adjacent "Download" section.

Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury