Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...

We have updated our Cookie Policy to reflect changes in the law on cookies used on websites in Europe. This website uses cookies to maximize your experience and help us to understand how we can improve it. To find out more click here.

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of data which are downloaded to your computer, or other device, when you visit a website. Cookies allow us to recognize your computer and improve your experience on our website. Some cookies are also necessary for the technical operation of our website. Please read our Cookie Policy which provides important information about the cookies we use, how we use them and how they can be deleted. Please remember that deleting cookies may affect your experience of our website.

Show less.

Accept and hide this message
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury
Pillsbury
Case Study

Tenacious Advocacy Pays Off in Big Bankruptcy Recovery

December 2009

“Even holders of pre-bankruptcy Solutia’s common shares will make a recovery, despite repeated warnings by the company that those shares would be worthless. ... Those who had been set to get nothing could wind up owning a combined 18 percent of a growing corporation.”

St. Louis Post-Dispatch, September 27, 2007

St. Louis-based Solutia Inc. was born in 1997, when a pharmaceutical company subsidiary spun off most of its chemicals businesses to shareholders as an independent entity. But that spin-off left Solutia with “hundreds of millions of dollars in yearly liabilities for environmental cleanup, litigation and employees’ healthcare,” as reported by The Deal magazine. Six years later, Solutia filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, relegating shareholders to the lowest priority claims in a company with a negative $370 million net value.

Pillsbury represented the Official Committee of Equity Holders, which appeared to have little legal leverage in Solutia’s bankruptcy proceedings. But with Pillsbury’s advocacy, the equity committee “created a big bump in Solutia’s road to emergence,” according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

The committee brought suit against Solutia’s former parent and demanded that the parent company take back more than $2 billion in legacy liabilities that had been allocated to Solutia at its spin-off. In addition, “the equity committee did not shy away from offering a scathing assessment of the restructuring plan and disclosure statement Solutia filed,” according to Bankruptcy Law360.

After four years in court, Pillsbury’s tough line paid off. As a settlement, the equity holders received 1% of the new Solutia stock, and another 17% of the company’s stock was made available to them at a steeply discounted rate to plan value.

Pillsbury
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury