Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...

We have updated our Cookie Policy to reflect changes in the law on cookies used on websites in Europe. This website uses cookies to maximize your experience and help us to understand how we can improve it. To find out more click here.

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of data which are downloaded to your computer, or other device, when you visit a website. Cookies allow us to recognize your computer and improve your experience on our website. Some cookies are also necessary for the technical operation of our website. Please read our Cookie Policy which provides important information about the cookies we use, how we use them and how they can be deleted. Please remember that deleting cookies may affect your experience of our website.

Show less.

Accept and hide this message
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury
Pillsbury

Related Offices

New York

Downloads

Bylined Article (4 pages)
What "Proceeds"? (PDF-475kb)
Resources
Bylined Article

What "Proceeds"?
The New York Law Journal
Authors: Anne C. Lefever, Daniel R. Margolis

10/12/2009

New York white-collar litigation partner Daniel Margolis and associate Anne LeFever penned this New York Law Journal article on the high-profile insider trading case, United States v. Nacchio, in which the Tenth Circuit weighed in on a controversy brewing in the Southern District of New York as to the correct interpretation of Section 981 of the Civil Assets Forfeiture Relief Act (CAFRA).

To read this publication in its entirety, click the link in the adjacent "Downloads" section.

 Pillsbury
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury