Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...

We have updated our Cookie Policy to reflect changes in the law on cookies used on websites in Europe. This website uses cookies to maximize your experience and help us to understand how we can improve it. To find out more click here.

Cookies are text files containing small amounts of data which are downloaded to your computer, or other device, when you visit a website. Cookies allow us to recognize your computer and improve your experience on our website. Some cookies are also necessary for the technical operation of our website. Please read our Cookie Policy which provides important information about the cookies we use, how we use them and how they can be deleted. Please remember that deleting cookies may affect your experience of our website.

Show less.

Accept and hide this message
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury
Pillsbury
Case Study

Winning a Rare Victory Against a Regulatory Agency

12/31/11
"[T]he Class B shares purchased by Ponderosa were public utility assets that were owned by Ponderosa. Therefore, the Commission's decision to credit the par value redemption proceeds of those shares to the ratepayers constituted an illegal appropriation of Ponderosa's property."
—Unanimous opinion by the California Court of Appeal, agreeing with the argument made by Pillsbury


When Pillsbury agreed to challenge a decision by the California Public Utilities Commission, it faced a real uphill battle. As noted by the court itself, the CPUC is no ordinary government agency but rather "a constitutional body with broad legislative and judicial powers," whose decisions are "presumed valid."

But Pillsbury litigators overcame this presumption to win a huge victory on behalf of a small telephone company that provides approximately 10,000 phone lines to remote customers in California's Sierra Nevada mountains. The firm's advocacy helped Ponderosa Telephone recover more than $5 million—a sum equivalent to two years' net income for the service provider.

At issue were proceeds from stock in the Rural Telephone Bank. As a condition of receiving a loan from this federally created bank, Ponderosa purchased RTB stock equal to 5 percent of the loan amount. When Ponderosa sold its stock, the CPUC said the proceeds should be transferred to the company's customers—despite the fact that, under an earlier CPUC decision, the stock had never been included among the "rate base" assets used to calculate what the company could charge its customers.

In the California Court of Appeal, Pillsbury overcame the high bar for reversing a CPUC decision by arguing that the commission's action was unconstitutional under the Takings Clause. Although Ponderosa was a regulated utility company, its stock was an asset owned by its shareholders and could not simply be taken away by the government.
The California Court of Appeal unanimously agreed with Pillsbury's argument, delivering a rare defeat to a government agency whose decisions are almost always affirmed.

For a copy of this publication, click the link in the adjacent "Downloads" section.
Pillsbury
Pillsbury Pillsbury Pillsbury