Virtual World Law Blog
Visit the Blog Now �
Startup America Partnership
Year-end Deadline for Correcting Section 409A Deferred Compensation Arrangements Conditioned on Employee Release or Covenant
Authors: Peter J. Hunt, Matthew C. Ryan1
By December 31, 2012, all deferred compensation arrangements in which payment is contingent on employee action, such as execution of a release of claims, must either include payment-timing restrictions that comport to IRS Notice 2010-80 or satisfy an exemption from section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Employers should review all deferred compensation arrangements, especially employment agreements, severance agreements, and change-in-control agreements that require employees to execute a release of claims, non-compete covenant, or non-solicitation covenant.
First NLRB Decisions on Social Media Give Employers Cause to Update Policies, Practices
Authors: Ellen Connelly Cohen, Christine Nicolaides Kearns, Rebecca Carr Rizzo
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) recently issued its first two rulings on employer social media policies and its first ruling on an employee’s termination due to posts on Facebook. These rulings are significant for all employers – not just those with unionized workforces – because they provide guidance regarding what social media behaviors will be deemed protected activity under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) and, therefore, what employers can and cannot regulate in their policies and practices.
Recently Enacted Legislation of Interest to California Employers
Authors: Ellen Connelly Cohen, Thomas N. Makris
September 30 was the last day for California Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. to sign or veto bills passed by the State Legislature during its 2011-2012 Regular Session. Governor Brown signed several bills of interest to California employers, including an overhaul of the Workers’ Compensation system, elimination of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission, new laws requiring accommodation of employees’ religious dress and grooming practices, restrictions on access to employees’ social media accounts, expanded state law protections for whistleblowers, and new rules governing employees’ rights to inspect their personnel files.
SEC Proposes Rules Eliminating Prohibition Against General Solicitation and General Advertising in Certain Private Placements
Authors: Louis A. Bevilacqua, Robert B. Robbins, Joseph R. Tiano, Jr.
On April 5, 2012, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the JOBS Act) was signed into law by President Obama with strong bipartisan support. The JOBS Act directed the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to amend Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 to permit general solicitation or general advertising in unregistered offerings made under Rule 506, provided that all purchasers of the securities are accredited investors. The SEC proposed rules on August 29, 2012 to implement that requirement.
Caution: New Ruling Muddles Administrative Exemption to California's Overtime Laws
Authors: Kathryn A. Nyce, Thomas N. Makris
In its recent decision in Harris v. Superior Court (Liberty Mutual) (B195121), California's Second District Court of Appeal muddied the waters that the state's Supreme Court had sought to clarify regarding the administrative exemption. It is widely anticipated that the case will make its way to the California Supreme Court again, but at least for now employers should be cautious and conservative in their use of the administrative exemption.
Court: Bank's Redemption of Trust Preferred Securities Due to Dodd-Frank Changes Is OK
Authors: Bruce A. Ericson, Jeffrey Jacobi
Wells Fargo has won a pair of precedent-setting victories connected to the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act, which are important to all financial institutions that issued, and have recently been considering redeeming, trust preferred securities. Many trust indentures contain "Capital Treatment Event" clauses that are very similar to those interpreted in these cases. The orders of a federal judge indicate that President Obama's signing of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 constituted a "Capital Treatment Event" that might entitle similarly situated banks to redeem their trust preferred securities, regardless of the timing of any so-called optional redemption date, so long as all other requirements are met.
Will New Jersey Join Other States Requiring Cash Back for Certain Stored Value Cards?
Authors: Deborah S. Thoren-Peden, JiJi Park, Amy L. Pierce, Jennifer So
On June 25, 2012, both the New Jersey Assembly and Senate voted to approve Senate Bill 1928, an act amending, among other laws, P.L. 2010, c.25. This law has been the subject of much controversy since it became effective in July of 2010, with litigation filed seeking to prevent its enforcement. In response, S.B. 1928 addresses the concerns raised about escheatment of stored value cards and other prepaid products, as well as newly enacted data collection obligations. S.B. 1928 would also impose on merchants and others a cash- back obligation on certain stored value cards, effective September 1, 2012.
IRS Ruling Says Auto Gratuities Are Treated as Wages, Not as Tips
Authors: Howard L. Clemons, Justin Krawitz
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently issued Rev. Rul. 2012-18 and interim guidance in Announcement 2012-25 relating to the treatment of auto gratuities as service charges. Businesses may have to change automated or manual reporting systems in order to comply with the proper treatment under the Revenue Ruling. The IRS is granting additional time in certain circumstances for businesses not currently in compliance to amend their business practices and make needed system changes.
Health Care Reform Update: Supreme Court Ruling Mandates Timely Employer Actions
Authors: Mark Jones, Susan P. Serota, Christine L. Richardson
The Supreme Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sibelius upholding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) leaves in place the market reforms and tax provisions that have become effective under health care reform over the last two years and gives a green light to the continued implementation of these measures. All health plan sponsors and administrators should continue to take action to comply with these requirements as they become effective. Employers whose plans fail the PPACA’s minimum standards of coverage or affordability should consider restructuring their benefits to avoid heavy penalties.
Clone Wars: When Does Imitation Become Infringement?
Source: Law360
Authors: Sean F. Kane, James G. Gatto
Video game developers have historically looked to successful games for inspiration. In a case involving the owner of renowned game Tetris, "inspiration" seemed to mirror plagiarism when Xio Interactive Inc. released it’s very similar game, Mino. In the end, a federal district court granted summary judgment to Tetris Holdings stating that the look and feel of Tetris is copyrightable as the expression of the idea distinguishable from the ideas of the game. In its opinion, the court reiterated the well-known refrain that game developers are free to use others' ideas, but not the expression of those ideas.
SEC Adopts Independence Rules for Compensation Committees and Their Advisers
Authors: Brian M. Wong, Susan P. Serota, Diana Chiu
In implementing Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Protection Act of 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules requiring national securities exchanges to adopt listing standards regarding the independence of compensation committee members, the committee’s retention of compensation advisers, the committee’s consideration of the independence of any advisers and the disclosure of any conflicts of interest of any advisers.
Supreme Court Rejects Agency Interpretation; Pharmaceutical Reps Exempt From Overtime
Authors: Michael J. Kass
In Christopher et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.,--- S.Ct. ----, 2012 WL 2196779, U.S., June 18, 2012 (NO. 11-20412, C.D.O.S, 6646, the Supreme Court rejected the Department of Labor's interpretation of its own regulations and instead concluded that pharmaceutical "detailers" are "outside salesmen" who are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act's ("FLSA") overtime wage requirements.
PRC Companies Can Now Tap Hong Kong's Public Debt Market Via ‘Dim Sum Bonds’
Authors: Woon-Wah Siu
Since the second half of 2007, China's financial institutions have been allowed to issue RMB-denominated bonds in Hong Kong (so-called "Dim Sum Bonds"). No mechanism existed for non-financial PRC institutions to offer these bonds directly. Therefore, institutions generally offered Dim Sum Bonds through their Hong Kong or other offshore subsidiaries. While the Bao Steel Group received approval to issue Dim Sum Bonds in late 2011, direct offerings by other non-financial institutions remained a murky territory. This changed on May 2, when the National Development and Reform Committee (NDRC) promulgated the Notice Concerning Offering RMB Denominated Bonds in Hong Kong by Domestic Non-Financial Institution Entities (Notice), which provides a roadmap for direct Dim Sum Bond offerings by non-financial PRC institutions.
Clone Wars: When Does Imitation Become Infringement?
Author: Sean F. Kane
Since the inception of the video game age, game developers have looked to successful games for inspiration. In some cases this has resulted in the creation of sub-genres of games serving the same niche markets while in other cases it has led to nearly identical games being made available by different entities. The latter situation is what led the owner of the renowned game Tetris to file suit against Xio Interactive Inc. over its game Mino. Mino is a falling block game which incorporates gameplay rules similar to Tetris, as well as utilizing a similar playing area and geometric block combinations.
Perspectives on Insurance Recovery Newsletter - Summer 2012
Authors: David L. Beck, James P. Bobotek, Laura P. Bourgeois, Kimberly L. Buffington, Peter M. Gillon, Vince Morgan, Rene L. Siemens, Raymond L. Sweigart, Robert L. Wallan
This edition of Pillsbury's Perspectives on Insurance Recovery covers the latest developments and trends in cyber-insurance. as well as other issues Pillsbury’s insurance attorneys have worked on and matters of the moment, including insurance issues related to asbestos, construction and other topics.
What if Your Insurer Goes Bankrupt and No One Tells You?
Source: Perspectives on Insurance Recovery Newsletter - Summer 2012
Authors: Laura P. Bourgeois
"Does an insurance broker, after procuring an insurance policy for a developer on a construction project, owe a duty to apprise a subcontractor that was later added as an insured under that policy of the insurance company's subsequent insolvency?"
10 Tips For Buying Cyber Insurance
Source: Perspectives on Insurance Recovery Newsletter - Summer 2012
Pillsbury's tips for reviewing cyber insurance policies—what to look for, ask for and include before you buy.
Public Companies Must Disclose Cyber-Liability Risks
Source: Perspectives on Insurance Recovery Newsletter - Summer 2012
Authors: David L. Beck, Rene L. Siemens
If you thought you did not need cyber insurance before, Uncle Sam may cause you to think otherwise. On October 13, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance issued guidance on disclosure obligations relating to cyber security risks and incidents. The guidance, which is based on existing disclosure requirements and is effective immediately, emphasizes the need for SEC registrants to provide "timely, comprehensive, and accurate information about [cyber] risks and events that a reasonable investor would consider important to an investment decision."
California Appellate Court Upholds Trial Court's Dismissal of a Coverage Claim for an Alleged Advertising Injury
Source: Perspectives on Insurance Recovery Newsletter - Summer 2012
Authors: Kimberly L. Buffington
A recent decision in California put a crimp in a rock star impersonator's effort to seek coverage for his liability to the rock star for "trading on his celebrity."
UK Supreme Court Pulls Trigger on Asbestos Liability Insurance
Source: Perspectives on Insurance Recovery Newsletter - Summer 2012
Authors: Raymond L. Sweigart
The UK's highest court has issued its decision in the Employers' Liability Insurance "Trigger" Litigation: BAI (Run Off) Ltd v Durham & Ors, [2012] UKSC 14 (28 March 2012), and finally resolved a long-pending dispute over insurance claims by the relatives of workers who died after being exposed to asbestos. The Supreme Court has ruled, without reference or comparison to the earlier resolution of similar issues in the United States, that insurance liability in the UK is triggered when an employee is exposed to asbestos, not when mesothelioma later manifests itself.
Preparing Your Business for the 2012 Atlantic Hurricane Season
Source: Perspectives on Insurance Recovery Newsletter - Summer 2012
Authors: Vince Morgan
The Atlantic Hurricane Season officially runs from June 1 to November 30, though peak activity usually occurs in August and September.
Cyber Insurance—Mitigating Loss from Cyber Attacks
Source: Perspectives on Insurance Recovery Newsletter - Summer 2012
Authors: Rene L. Siemens, David L. Beck
The market is rapidly growing for insurance that is specifically meant to cover losses arising out of cyber attacks and other privacy and data security breaches. These insurance policies are marketed under names like "cyber-liability insurance," "privacy breach insurance" and "network security insurance." Many companies and other institutions that handle legally protected information now view this kind of insurance as an essential part of their coverage programs.
Federal Circuit Provides Details on How to Adequately Plead Certain Infringement Claims
Authors: Evan Finkel
The recent opinion of the Federal Circuit in In re Bill of Lading Transmission and Processing System Patent Litigation, – F.3d – (Fed. Cir. Jun. 7, 2012)("In re Bill of Lading"), addresses in substantial detail the requirements for adequately pleading claims for direct infringement (including the direct infringement that is a necessary prerequisite for pleading indirect infringement), inducing infringement, and contributory infringement.
Given Recent Ruling, Will Negligence Claims Be Covered Under CGL Policies in Virginia?
Source: Perspectives on Insurance Recovery Newsletter - Summer 2012
Authors: Peter M. Gillon, James P. Bobotek
The Virginia Supreme Court recently issued a very troubling opinion for Virginia-based policyholders. In AES Corp. v. Steadfast Insurance Co.,1 the court held that when a lawsuit alleges that a company engaged in an intentional or volitional act where (i) it subjectively intended or anticipated the result, or (ii) the result was a natural or probable consequence of the intentional act, that company is not entitled to a defense or indemnity under its commercial general liability insurance coverage because a covered "occurrence" has not been alleged.
Employ Me, Don’t Friend Me: Privacy in the Age of Facebook
Authors: James G. Gatto, Julia E. Judish, Amy L. Pierce, Meighan E. O'Reardon
With the unprecedented popularity of social media, individuals have increasingly been willing accomplices in undermining their own privacy. Few would have predicted that millions of people would voluntarily log onto the Internet and share detailed private information about themselves, their friends, family and employers. Users of social media have implemented varying privacy safeguards from unrestricted blogs to Facebook posts limited to a customized list of friends. Even those who seek privacy, however, must contend with a growing practice by employers and others of requesting access to password-protected social media accounts. Social media users have lost jobs and educational opportunities as a result of the increased scrutiny of these private postings. Maryland recently became the first state to enact a law prohibiting this practice; several other states and the U.S. Senate and House have similar legislation under review.
California Tax Board Provides Guidance on the Broadened Definition of ‘Retailer Engaged in Business in This State’
Authors: Annie H. Huang, Jeffrey M. Vesely, Paul T. Casas
On May 30, 2012, the State Board of Equalization (“SBE”), approved pro-posed amendments to the California Code of Regulations, Title 18, section 1684 (“Proposed Regulation”). The Proposed Regulation attempts to provide guidance as to the meaning of the broadened statutory definition of “retailers engaged in business in this state.” The statutory definition now includes retailers who are members of “commonly controlled groups,” as well as retailers who enter into agreements with “a person or persons in this state” who meet certain minimum thresholds.
Proposed Rule: Nondisplacement of Qualified Incumbent Employees Under Service Contracts
Authors: C. Joël Van Over, Clare M. Cavaliero
On Thursday, May 3, 2012, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council issued a proposed rule to add a new subpart and contract clause to the Federal Acquisition Regulation that will require successor contractors to offer a right of first refusal of employment to qualified incumbent employees under service contracts.
UK Bribery Act: Should You Worry About Taking Customers to the Olympic Games?
Author: Raymond L. Sweigart
The 2012 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games in London offer a unique opportunity for companies to promote their businesses through entertainment of customers or clients at the various game venues. Has the UK Bribery Act 2010 put a damper on these time-honored business practices and the manner and methods by which business organisations seek to obtain and retain business?
Recent Developments May Impact Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Verification Processes And Contracting
Authors: C. Joël Van Over, Nicole Y. Beeler
Over the past few weeks there have been two significant developments that may impact both the U.S. Department of Defense's (DoD) and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' (the "VA") Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) verification process and procedures. Together, these developments may significantly impact SDVOSB verification processes and contract procedures.
EEOC Raises the Bar on Employers to Show that Employment Actions Are Job-Related
Authors: Julia E. Judish, Darcy L. Muilenburg
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) recently issued an Enforcement Guidance on employers’ use of arrest and conviction records in hiring, as well as published a final rule clarifying the “reasonable factors other than age”(“RFOA”) defense under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). Both the Guidance and the new regulations demonstrate the EEOC’s focus on requiring employers to demonstrate the legitimate, job-related basis for employment actions.
Proposed EPA Limits on CO2 Would Require Major Technology Advances for Coal-Fired Power Plants
Authors: Anthony B. Cavender, David R. Farabee, Robert A. James, Peter H. Wyckoff
In an action long-awaited by environmental activists and viewed with some trepidation by the business community, on April 13, 2012, EPA published in the Federal Register its proposed greenhouse gas (GHG) emission limits for new power plants (technically, electric utility generating units or EGUs).1 Comments on the proposed rule must be received by EPA no later than June 25, 2012.
Compliance Deadlines
Source: Perspectives: An Executive Compensation, Benefits & Human Resources Law Update - Spring 2012 | Volume 3, Edition 1
Service Provider Fee Disclosures
Deadline
July 1, 2012 for both new and existing arrangements
Department of Labor Issues Final Regulations on Fee Disclosures for Pension Plans1
Source: Perspectives: An Executive Compensation, Benefits & Human Resources Law Update - Spring 2012 | Volume 3, Edition 1
Authors: Susan P. Serota, Kathleen D. Bardunias
On February 2, 2012, the Department of Labor ("DOL") released the final regulations under Section 408(b)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), requiring certain retirement plan service providers to disclose fee-related information to plan fiduciaries. These new disclosure obligations are intended to assist retirement plan fiduciaries in assessing the "reasonableness" of the contract or arrangement in connection with the ERISA section 408(b)(2) prohibited transaction exemption. The final regulations are effective for all applicable service provider arrangements as of July 1, 2012 (including new and existing arrangements). Plan fiduciaries and retirement plan service providers should begin reviewing service agreements now to ensure timely fee and compensation disclosure in compliance with the new regulations. The goal of the regulations is to make it easier for plan fiduciaries to assess whether the compensation paid to plan service providers is "reasonable" and if there are any conflicts of interest between the plan and the service provider.
Department of Labor Issues Final Regulations on Fee Disclosures for Participant-Directed Plans1
Source: Perspectives: An Executive Compensation, Benefits & Human Resources Law Update - Spring 2012 | Volume 3, Edition 1
Authors: Susan P. Serota, Howard L. Clemons, John J. Battaglia
On October 14, 2010, the Department of Labor released final regulations detailing a plan administrator's fiduciary responsibilities regarding disclosure of plan and investment-related information, including fee and expense information, to participants and beneficiaries of participant-directed individual account plans such as 401(k) plans. Because the final regulation is promulgated under the general fiduciary provisions of section 404(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), it applies generally to all participant-directed plans, not just those that intend to meet the ERISA section 404(c) plan requirements. Based on the final rules, as amended, sponsors of calendar year plans must begin providing this information to participants no later than August 30, 2012.
Perspectives: An Executive Compensation, Benefits & Human Resources Law Update - Spring 2012 | Volume 3, Edition 1
Authors: Susan P. Serota, Kathleen D. Bardunias, Howard L. Clemons
Compliance Deadlines
This issue of Perspectives provides a comprehensive discussion of the final Department of Labor regulations on Plan Service Provider Fee Disclosures (issued on February 2, 2012 and required to be provided to plan fiduciaries by July 1, 2012) and Participant-level Fee Disclosures for Participant-Directed Plans, such as 401(k) plans, (issued on October 14, 2010 and required to be provided initially to participants who may direct investments in their accounts by August 30, 2012 for calendar year plans). Susan Serota and Kathleen Bardunias of our New York Executive Compensation and Benefits group address the scope of the requirement for plan service providers to provide certain fee-related information to plan fiduciaries to help them assess whether such fees are "reasonable" under the ERISA prohibited transaction exemption provided in ERISA section 408(b)(2) for the provision of services between a plan and a party-in-interest. Howard Clemons of our Northern Virginia office updates an earlier Client Alert to reflect the coordination of the effective dates for plan service provider fee disclosures with the participant-level disclosures effective dates.
FCC Enforcement Monitor
Authors: Scott R. Flick, Lauren A. Birzon
Headlines:
- The FCC's $10,000 fines for items missing from the public inspection file continue
- License cancellation no obstacle to FCC proposing $18,000 fine against former broadcaster
JOBS Act is Not a Regulatory Cure-All for Private Funds
Author: Kimberly V. Mann
The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act or Act), which was signed into law on April 5, 2012, could improve substantially the fundraising prospects for private funds. Elimination of the prohibition against general solicitation and general advertising will increase exposure for private funds and, consequently, the pool of prospective investors. Although the JOBS Act and rules to be adopted in connection with the Act will in some ways revolutionize private offerings, it is important for private funds to keep in mind the restrictions on U.S. private offerings that are unaffected by the JOBS Act.
California Employers Get a Break on Meal and Rest Claims But Still Face Class Action Filings
Authors: Paula M. Weber, Thomas N. Makris, Darcy L. Muilenburg, Kathryn A. Nyce, Erin C. Carroll
In a highly anticipated decision, on April 12 the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court held that employers are not obligated to ensure that nonexempt employees take their meal breaks. However, the court's guidance on the timing of breaks will come as a surprise to many employers, and the court also left the door open for more class action lawsuits.
U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Scope of "Actual Damages" in the Federal Privacy Act
Authors: Christine A. Scheuneman, Catherine D. Meyer, Amy L. Pierce, Jennifer So
In its March 28 decision in Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper, the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the federal Privacy Act of 1974 and held that the term "actual damages," as used in the Act, does not include damages for mental or emotional distress. Because of its chameleon-like quality, the meaning of the term "actual damages" was considered in the particular context in which it appeared. The Court then found that, because Congress declined to authorize general damages for a violation of the Act, it was reasonable to infer that it intended "actual damages" to mean special damages for proven pecuniary loss.
JOBS Act Targets Smaller Business Capital Raising
Authors: Louis A. Bevilacqua, Joseph R. Tiano, Jr., David S. Baxter, K. Brian Joe, Ali Panjwani, Anna Park
On April 5, 2012, President Obama signed into law the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act), a bill with widespread bipartisan support and assembled from a combination of legislative initiatives introduced throughout 2011 targeting smaller companies and focusing on cheaper capital raising and job creation. We discuss the key provisions of the JOBS Act and their impact on these companies and securities offerings.


