Part 1: After Alice v. CLS Bank
Tuesday, March 1, 2016
10:00 am PT
Noon CT
1:00 pm ET
Part 2: Section 101, Alice & Mayo
Part 2: Tuesday, March 8, 2016
10:00 am PT
Noon CT
1:00 pm ET
Date & Time
3/1/2016 & 3/8/2016
Part 1: After Alice v. CLS Bank
Strategic Considerations for Preparing and Prosecuting Patent Applications for Computer-Implemented Inventions
This presentation examines the post-Alice landscape of patent eligibility for computer-implemented inventions following the 2014 Alice v. CLS Bank Supreme Court decision and explores patent prosecution and drafting strategies for patent prosecutors and in-house counsel in this post-Alice era.
Presenters:
Josh Tucker, Partner
Ngai Zhang, Senior Associate
Part 2: Section 101 Alice & Mayo
Litigation trends for invalidity challenges under Section 101
This timely webinar examines the state of patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. §101 after two recent Supreme Court rulings: Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., whose framework led to the two-part test for eligibility described in Alice v. CLS Bank. The presentation will include a discussion of litigation trends across the country for invalidity challenges under Section 101, and provide practical advice for patent litigators and in-house counsel facing or contemplating a challenge to an asserted patent under Section 101.
Presenters:
Michael Chibib, Partner
Matthew Stephens, Associate
Download:
Part 2: Section 101, Alice & Mayo – Litigation Trends for Invalidity Challenges Under Section 101
Pillsbury