Audrey Lo is a special counsel in the firm’s intellectual property practice with a background in computer science and biotechnology.
Audrey’s practice is focused on patent litigation, IP due diligence and pre-litigation counseling. Her responsibilities have covered all phases of litigation including discovery, claim construction, expert reports, dispositive motion practice, and trial practice. Her experience consists of a variety of technology areas, including network security, content delivery networks, home security, geolocation, database software, medical instrumentation, mobile devices, and automotive. Audrey has represented clients in patent venues such as the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, the Northern and Central Districts of California, the District of Delaware, the Northern District of Illinois, and the District of Massachusetts, as well as the International Trade Commission.
Representative Experience
- Represented AVer Information Inc. in ITC investigation involving document cameras (In the Matter of Certain Document Cameras and Software for Use Therewith).
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. eBay, Inc. (E.D. Tex., N.D. Cal.) - Defended eBay against patent infringement assertions regarding virtualization technology in Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. eBay, Inc. (E.D. Tex., N.D. Cal.).
- Implicit, LLC v. Trend Micro, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) - Represented Trend Micro in patent infringement action involving network security technology in Implicit, LLC v. Trend Micro, Inc. (E.D. Tex.).
View More
- In ComCam International Inc v. ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services (E.D. Tex.) represented ADT in patent infringement suit regarding home security systems.
- In Selene Communication Techs., LLC v. Trend Micro, Inc. (D. Del., N.D. Cal.), represented Trend Micro in patent infringement action involving network security technology.
- In Tetsuya Joe Nomura v. YouTube, Tetsuya Joe Nomura v. Amazon (N.D. Cal.), defended YouTube and Amazon against claims of patent infringement regarding video delivery systems.
- In Minitab, Inc. v. EngineRoom, LLC (M.D. Pa.), represented Minitab in declaratory judgment action for invalidity and non-infringement of patents involving statistical software packages.
- In World Wide Stationery Mfg Co., Ltd. v. Bensons International Systems, Inc. et al. (N.D. Ill.), represented World Wide Stationery in patent infringement suit involving binder ring mechanisms.
- In Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google Inc. (D. Mass.), defended Google against patent infringement claims regarding Wi-Fi location technology.
- In Kruse Tech. Partnership v. Daimler AG et al. (C.D. Cal.), defended Daimler against claims of patent infringement involving diesel engines.
- Represented Sharp Corporation in antitrust suit involving flat panel displays – In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Cal.).
- In MMCA v. Hewlett-Packard Co. (N.D. Cal.), defended Hewlett-Packard in a breach of contract and trade secret matter concerning anti-counterfeiting investigations.
- Represented Maquet Cardiovascular in a patent infringement lawsuit involving endoscopic vein harvesting technology – In the Matter of Certain Vein Harvesting Surgical Systems and Components Thereof (ITC) and Maquet Cardiovascular, LLC v. Terumo Corporation and Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corporation (N.D. Cal.).
- In Volumetrics Medical Imaging, LLC v. Medison, Inc., GE Healthcare, LTD et al. (M.D.N.C.), defended Medison in a patent infringement lawsuit concerning ultrasound imaging patents.
- In Diagnostic Systems Corporation v. Cognos Corp. (C.D. Cal.) and Juxtacomm Technologies, Inc. v. Cognos Corp. (E.D. Tex.), defended Cognos against claims of infringement of patents covering database software.
- In Associated General Contractors of America, San Diego Chapter Inc. v. California Department of Transportation, et al. (E.D. Cal.), represented defendant-intervenors Coalition for Economic Equity and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, San Diego Chapter, in lawsuit regarding the constitutionality of Caltrans’ public highway contracting program.
- In Richard Sander et al. v. The State Bar of California et al. (Cal.), represented proposed intervenors against Sander in privacy action.
- In Televisa S A de C V v. Univision Communications Inc. (C.D. Cal.), represented Televisa in breach of contract action regarding royalties for television programming.
Professional Highlights
Honors & Awards
- Recognized by Best Lawyers (published by BL Rankings LLC) Ones to Watch, Intellectual Property Law and Litigation – Intellectual Property (2024)
Professional/Civic Activities
- American Bar Association
- Santa Clara County Bar Association
- Asian Pacific Bar Association of Silicon Valley
Education
-
J.D., Santa Clara University School of Law, 2007
(Santa Clara Law Review, editor; Emery Scholarship)M.A., Bioinformatics/Computational Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 2002
B.A., Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 2001
Admissions
-
California
Courts
-
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Languages
-
Chinese (Mandarin)