Alert 04.25.24
Theresa Roozen is a trial lawyer who focuses her practice on intellectual property and complex commercial litigation before federal courts and agencies.
Theresa has experience in all stages of litigation and mediation, including drafting motions and responses, drafting discovery requests and responses, engaging in large scale e-discovery, conducting and defending depositions, engaging in claim construction, working with expert witnesses, analyzing infringement and validity positions, engaging in trial representation, preparing post-trial briefs and drafting settlement agreements. Her practice involves a range of technologies, including alarm systems, batteries, medical devices, semiconductors and stud finders. Theresa has represented plaintiffs enforcing their intellectual property rights and defended parties accused of infringing intellectual property rights. She has also represented clients in commercial litigation cases.
Representative Experience
- Represented respondents regarding alleged patent infringement. (Certain Electronic Stud Finders, Metal Detectors and Electrical Scanners, 337-TA-1221 (U.S.I.T.C.)) (pending).
- Represented intervenors regarding appeal of a U.S. International Trade Commission decision. (Zircon Corp. v. International Trade Commission, 22-1649 (Fed. Cir.)) (pending).
- Represented plaintiff regarding alleged trademark infringement. (The Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. v. The CCBN LLC d/b/a The CCBN, 1:23-cv-00824 (D.D.C.)).
View More
- Represented defendants regarding alleged patent infringement. (Stingray IP Solutions LLC v. ADT Inc., 2:22-cv-00421 (E.D. Tex.)) (pending).
- Represented plaintiff regarding alleged patent infringement. (Blue Engine Biologics, LLC v. Arteriocyte Medical Systems, Inc., 1:21-cv-11098 (D. Mass.)).
- Represented plaintiff regarding alleged misappropriation of trade secrets and other claims. (ADT Holdings Inc. v. Harris, 2017-0328 (Del. Ch.)).
- Represented defendant regarding alleged patent infringement. (Stryker Corp. v. MicroVention, Inc., 1:21-cv-00036 (D. Del.)).
- Represented defendant regarding alleged patent infringement. (Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. ViewRay, Inc., 3:19-cv-05697 (N.D. Cal.)).
- Represented defendant regarding alleged patent infringement. (Applied Capital, Inc. v. The ADT Corp., 1:16-cv-00815 (D.N.M.)).
- Represented defendant regarding alleged patent infringement. (Ultravision Techs., LLC v. Barco NV, 2:19-cv-00253 (E.D. Tex.)).
- Represented defendant regarding alleged patent infringement. (Portus Singapore Pte Ltd. v. ADT LLC, 6:20-cv-00605 (W.D. Tex.)).
- Represented respondents regarding alleged patent infringement. (Certain Batteries and Electrochemical Devices Containing Composite Separators, Components Thereof and Products Containing Same, 337-TA-1087 (U.S. ITC)).
- Represented respondent Barco regarding alleged patent infringement. (Certain Modular LED Display Panels and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1114 (U.S. ITC)).
Professional Highlights
- International Trade Commission Trial Lawyer Association, Young Lawyers’ Committee and Members Committee
Speaking Engagements
- 2023 ITC Trial Lawyers Association Spring Meeting, Panelist.
Education
-
J.D., Georgetown University Law Center, 2014
B.S., Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, 2011
Admissions
-
Pennsylvania
District of Columbia
Virginia
Courts
-
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia