After Alice Two-Part Webinar Series

Part 1: After Alice v. CLS Bank

Strategic Considerations for Preparing and Prosecuting Patent Applications for Computer-Implemented Inventions

This presentation examines the post-Alice landscape of patent eligibility for computer-implemented inventions following the 2014 Alice v. CLS Bank Supreme Court decision and explores patent prosecution and drafting strategies for patent prosecutors and in-house counsel in this post-Alice era.

Presenters:

Josh Tucker, Partner

Ngai Zhang, Senior Associate

Part 2: Section 101 Alice & Mayo

Litigation trends for invalidity challenges under Section 101

This timely webinar examines the state of patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. §101 after two recent Supreme Court rulings: Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., whose framework led to the two-part test for eligibility described in Alice v. CLS Bank. The presentation will include a discussion of litigation trends across the country for invalidity challenges under Section 101, and provide practical advice for patent litigators and in-house counsel facing or contemplating a challenge to an asserted patent under Section 101.

Presenters:

Michael Chibib, Partner

Matthew Stephens, Associate

Download:

After Alice v. CLS Bank – Strategic Considerations for Preparing and Prosecuting Patent Applications for Computer-Implemented Inventions

Part 2: Section 101, Alice & Mayo – Litigation Trends for Invalidity Challenges Under Section 101