In a recent Law360 article, Pillsbury litigation attorneys Christine Scheuneman, Brian Martin, Amy Pierce and Nathaniel Smith discussed the implications of the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Kilgore v. KeyBank, N.A.

Sitting en banc, the court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) preempts the California Broughton-Cruz rule that prohibited arbitrating claims for injunctive relief under California’s Unfair Competition Law.

However, the Kilgore decision leaves open the question of whether and to what extent the Broughton-Cruz rule survives U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion.

To read the article in its entirety, please click here.