Takeaways

New guidance, issued in the form of a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ), states that PPP applicants must consider their access to other sources of liquidity before certifying that the “[c]urrent economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the Applicant.”
This is the first such guidance SBA or Treasury has issued concerning the PPP’s “necessity” certification, which has been the cause of significant confusion among applicants.
The guidance states that the requirement to consider alternative liquidity is retroactive, but that a borrower that applied for a PPP loan before the issuance of this guidance may repay the loan in full by May 7, 2020, if it determines that its certification of “necessity” is no longer valid in light of the guidance. This “safe harbor” provision has been incorporated into a draft interim final rule to be published imminently.

On April 24, 2020, President Trump signed into law the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, whose provisions we summarized here. In relevant part, this Act increases by $310 billion the funds appropriated for the PPP established on March 27, 2020, by the CARES Act, whose provisions we summarized here. The SBA has announced that new loans under this second tranche of PPP appropriations will commence April 27, 2020. As the PPP has evolved since its inception on March 27, so too have SBA and Treasury’s articulation of its requirements. One of the agencies’ primary mechanisms for conveying these requirements to borrowers has been through a regularly updated list of Frequently Asked Questions, many of which the SBA then formalizes through interim final rules that it publishes in the Federal Register.

PPP applicants are required to make a number of certifications in connection with their applications, for example concerning their eligibility and the purposes for which they will use the loans. Attention to these certifications is extremely important, given the severe penalties that are possible for submitting false or misleading certifications to the government. One such certification that has drawn particular scrutiny is the certification that the “[c]urrent economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the Applicant.” Many applicants have noted that this certification is vague and have sought guidance on it.

On April 23, 2020, SBA and Treasury added the following new FAQ concerning this certification, reproduced below in full:

31.  Question: Do businesses owned by large companies with adequate sources of liquidity to support the business’s ongoing operations qualify for a PPP loan?

Answer: In addition to reviewing applicable affiliation rules to determine eligibility, all borrowers must assess their economic need for a PPP loan under the standard established by the CARES Act and the PPP regulations at the time of the loan application. Although the CARES Act suspends the ordinary requirement that borrowers must be unable to obtain credit elsewhere (as defined in section 3(h) of the Small Business Act), borrowers still must certify in good faith that their PPP loan request is necessary. Specifically, before submitting a PPP application, all borrowers should review carefully the required certification that “[c]urrent economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the Applicant.” Borrowers must make this certification in good faith, taking into account their current business activity and their ability to access other sources of liquidity sufficient to support their ongoing operations in a manner that is not significantly detrimental to the business. For example, it is unlikely that a public company with substantial market value and access to capital markets will be able to make the required certification in good faith, and such a company should be prepared to demonstrate to SBA, upon request, the basis for its certification.

Lenders may rely on a borrower’s certification regarding the necessity of the loan request. Any borrower that applied for a PPP loan prior to the issuance of this guidance and repays the loan in full by May 7, 2020, will be deemed by SBA to have made the required certification in good faith.

There are four key takeaways from this new guidance:

  1. Borrowers must have considered “their ability to access other sources of liquidity sufficient to support their ongoing operations in a manner that is not significantly detrimental to the business.” This is the first time that SBA or Treasury has suggested the need to consider alternative liquidity.
  2. This requirement is retroactive to certifications that pre-dated the guidance (and, indeed, loans already issued).
  3. In light of the requirement’s retroactivity, the SBA has announced a safe harbor until May 7, 2020, for borrowers to return loans if any of the SBA’s subsequent guidance has changed the validity of their application certifications. On April 24, 2020, the SBA incorporated this safe harbor provision into new interim final rule.
  4. The new guidance suggests that publicly traded companies, in particular, will have to carefully consider their alternate sources of liquidity. The FAQ’s discussion of public companies appears to be a reaction to the media backlash over the receipt of PPP loans by various public companies.

Pillsbury attorneys are assisting clients interpret and assess the new PPP requirements. We are proactively monitoring any forthcoming regulations and guidance.


Pillsbury’s experienced multidisciplinary COVID-19 Task Force is closely monitoring the global threat of COVID-19 and providing real-time advice across industry sectors, drawing on the firm’s capabilities in crisis management, employment law, insurance recovery, real estate, supply chain management, cybersecurity, corporate and contracts law and other areas to provide critical guidance to clients in an urgent and quickly evolving situation. For more thought leadership on this rapidly developing topic, please visit our COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Resource Center.

These and any accompanying materials are not legal advice, are not a complete summary of the subject matter, and are subject to the terms of use found at: https://www.pillsburylaw.com/en/terms-of-use.html. We recommend that you obtain separate legal advice.