Speaker 04.29.26
04.29
Sanctions Evasion: Identifying Criticial Red Flags Amid Rising Risks in Russia, China and Iran
National Press Club
529 14th St NW
Washington, DC 20045
Service
Contacts
Pillsbury’s highly experienced International Trade team has successfully handled every type of trade remedy proceeding, guiding clients through investigations, Commerce Department and ITC hearings, and litigation in court.
Pillsbury lawyers have extensive experience representing clients in trade remedy proceedings before the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission. These complex topics include antidumping issues, anti-circumvention, hyperinflation and non-market economies, as well as the countervailability of subsidies granted to government-owned entities before their privatization. We also handle appeals to the Court of International Trade, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Our International Trade lawyers have handled investigations by the Office of U.S. Trade Representative of foreign country trade practices under Section 301, Commerce Department national security import restriction proceedings under Section 232 and ITC investigations under Section 332. Our firm’s representation of clients in import relief proceedings goes beyond the U.S. With the increasing standardization of antidumping duty regimes under the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, Pillsbury lawyers have assisted companies subject to antidumping duty actions throughout the world, including those located in the EU and Australia. We have also organized and represented industry coalitions in trade remedy disputes, and we work closely with government relations specialists to coordinate strategies when political considerations may influence determinations.
View More
We take a proactive approach, assisting clients with advanced planning, analyzing the extent to which their current or planned pricing strategies or use of government benefits may risk a finding of dumping or subsidized exports. In U.S. antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings, we have greatly minimized or eliminated foreign respondents’ exposure to import duties or obtained revocation of antidumping duty orders. Our experience in AD and CVD investigations and reviews includes countless cases impacting various global industries.
We have organized and represented industry coalitions in trade remedy disputes, and we work closely with government relations specialists to coordinate strategies in situations where political considerations may influence determinations.
View More
Successfully obtained rare Department of Commerce approval for Japanese utility for uranium “swap” and reexport transaction under the Russian Suspension Agreement.
Represent nuclear engineering and manufacturing company before the Court of International Trade in challenge to import duties on products from China under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.
View More