Blog Post 06.21.22
Alert
07.25.23
After more than a year of deliberations, the U.S. government appears close to implementing an outbound investment review mechanism that would regulate certain U.S.-origin investments in countries of concern, notably China. These efforts are part of a wider effort by the U.S. government to restrict access to certain sectors of the Chinese market in the name of national security. Our prior alert on this subject is found here.
The outbound investment review mechanism, which is akin to a “reverse” Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) framework, is widely expected to require a notification to the U.S. government by U.S. persons in connection with certain outbound investments from the United States to countries of concern. It is possible that in addition to a notification requirement, certain transactions may be subject to review and government approval, with a smaller subset of investments in certain named companies being prohibited. While both the Biden administration and Congress appear to be in agreement about the need for review for investments in certain emerging technology sectors that involve “countries of concern,” the form of the review mechanism remains hotly contested. At this point in time, it is possible that regulations may be established by an executive order (EO), legislation or a form of hybrid approach.
Potential Executive Order
Based on public reporting and statements from U.S. government officials, the Biden Administration continues to consider issuing an EO on outbound investment, and such an EO could be published in the near term. U.S. Department of Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen recently stated that such a mechanism would be “narrowly scoped” and seek to strengthen U.S. national security, rather than restrict trade.
While no final decision has been announced, it has been widely reported that the EO would target investments in China’s advanced semiconductor, quantum computing and artificial intelligence (AI) sectors and prohibit U.S. persons from engaging in certain investments in these sectors. It has further been reported that the EO would likely not take effect until 2024 and would only apply to new investments.
There have been very few official statements detailing the specific scope of a potential EO. For example, it is unclear if the EO would only require notification regarding certain types of investment, or if it will cast a wider net, establishing a mandatory review of certain investments or perhaps outright prohibition in certain sectors. Unlike CFIUS, which underwent recent changes through the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA), an outbound investment system would be established through an entirely new legal mechanism, rather than building upon a pre-existing process.
The Biden administration’s potential EO will likely be informed by any legislation which may be passed in the coming months (discussed further below).
Pending Legislation
At this time, several bills are pending in Congress that could impact U.S. investment in China.
On July 13, Senators Bob Casey (D-PA) and John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced the Outbound Investment Transparency Act (OITA) as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (NDAA). This bill is built on the foundation of the National Critical Capabilities Defense Act of 2021 (2021 NCCDA). The OITA is still pending and is the source of some contention in Congress.
If passed and signed into law, the OITA would require a “U.S. person” that plans to engage in a covered investment to submit a notification no later than 14 days before the anticipated completion date of the transaction to the Secretary of Treasury, who will then disseminate the notification to the relevant lead agency for review. Note that a U.S. person is defined in the bill as:
As currently drafted, the OITA would require notification by U.S. persons to the U.S. government for “covered” economic activities in “countries of concern.” It defines a “covered activity” as certain activities engaged in by a U.S. person in a “national critical capabilities” sector. Relevant activities include the following:
The amendment also defines a “covered foreign entity” as any entity that is incorporated in, has a principal place of business in, or is organized under the laws of a country of concern.
Sectors of “national critical capabilities” include the following:
“Critical capabilities” may also include any other technology that if produced in the United States would be included on the Commerce Control List under the Export Administration Regulations and subject to a license requirement if theoretically exporting that technology to a country of concern.
If passed, the OITA would require the administration to promulgate regulations to implement the bill and will take effect 90 days after the regulations are put into place. Failure to comply with the regulations may result in a civil penalty of up to $250,000 or twice the amount of the base covered activity. At this point, it is unclear if the proposed amendment would act as an alternative to the anticipated EO or if it could supplement it. While Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has expressed support for the OITA, others have argued that it would establish a clunky and inefficient mechanism.
Separately, in May 2023 Representatives Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) introduced an updated National Critical Capabilities Defense Act of 2023 (2023 NCCDA), revising the 2021 NCCDA language to reflect new sector priorities and additional review authorities in the Act, among other changes. The 2023 NCCDA, which maintains the same foundational language as the Casey-Cornyn amendment, would create a national security review process for outbound transactions by U.S. companies investing overseas. In key part, the bill would:
At time of publication, the 2023 NCCDA remains pending before the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Finally, Representative Andy Barr (R-KY) is reportedly drafting legislation that would prohibit investment in specific Chinese companies. Based on public reporting, it would require federal agencies that maintain restrictive lists, such as the Department of Commerce and Department of Treasury, to prioritize sanctions on certain Chinese sectors. The bill is the least restrictive of the three and would mirror existing sanctions programs.
Recent Action by the China Select Committee
As creation of an outbound investment review mechanism approaches, the House Select Committee on China has grown increasingly active. On July 13, 2023, the Select Committee held a hearing on the risks of doing business in China. More recently, the Committee has sent letters to a number of companies seeking information on investments in China in order to inform its legislative efforts.
Congress remains increasingly invested in evaluating the relationship between the United States and China, and we expect further investigations in a number of areas in addition to outbound investment regulation.