Blog Post 06.08.20
Alert
Alert
06.18.20
The Small Business Administration (SBA) on June 12, 2020 posted an Interim Final Rule to implement changes made to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) by the Flexibility Act. We summarized the key provisions of the Flexibility Act here. The majority of the provisions in the new Interim Final Rule are pro forma, merely amending the SBA’s initial April 2, 2020 rule to adopt the Flexibility Act’s new timeframes and definitions, as follows:
The most notable facet of the Interim Final Rule is SBA’s implementation of the Flexibility Act’s requirement that PPP borrowers spend at least 60 percent of their loan proceeds on payroll costs in order to achieve full loan forgiveness. In implementing the original CARES Act provisions establishing the PPP, the SBA’s initial rule imposed a requirement not found in the CARES Act that “at least 75 percent of the PPP loan proceeds shall be used for payroll costs.” In addition to changing the minimum payroll cost percentage to 60, the Flexibility Act appeared to clarify that this percentage relates to forgiveness only and does not otherwise limit loan use.
The new Interim Final Rule, however, simply amends the provisions of SBA’s initial rule by substituting the number 60 for the number 75. In so doing, the Interim Final Rule continues to state: “At least 60 percent of the PPP loan proceeds shall be used for payroll costs.” Moreover, the Interim Final Rule amends the relevant borrower certifications as follows:
"The funds will be used to retain workers and maintain payroll or make mortgage interest payments, lease payments, and utility payments; I understand that if the funds are knowingly used for unauthorized purposes, the Federal Government may hold me legally liable such as for charges of fraud. As explained above, not more than 40 percent of loan proceeds may be used for nonpayroll costs."
In spite of the apparent mandate that at least 60 percent of PPP loan proceeds be used for payroll costs, the Interim Final Rule also explains how to calculate a proportional reduction in forgiveness if less than 60 percent of loan proceeds are spend on payroll costs. Specifically, the Interim Final Rule provides the following example:
"If a borrower receives a $100,000 PPP loan, and during the covered period the borrower spends $54,000 (or 54 percent) of its loan on payroll costs, then because the borrower used less than 60 percent of its loan on payroll costs, the maximum amount of loan forgiveness the borrower may receive is $90,000 (with $54,000 in payroll costs constituting 60 percent of the forgiveness amount and $36,000 in non-payroll costs constituting 40 percent of the forgiveness amount)."
It is not clear whether the foregoing provisions of the Interim Final Rule relating to loan forgiveness and loan use are reconcilable.
In addition to its new regulations, the SBA has issued revised versions of the: (1) PPP loan application; (2) PPP forgiveness instructions; and (3) PPP forgiveness application in light of the Flexibility Act’s program changes. The revised forgiveness instructions and application otherwise follow the same mechanics as the original instructions and application, which we summarized here.
The SBA also has issued a new “EZ” streamlined forgiveness application and EZ forgiveness application instructions that apply to: (1) self-employed individual borrowers who had no other employees at the time of the PPP loan application; or (2) borrowers able to certify that they are not subject to loan forgiveness reductions. Specifically, a borrower can make such a certification under either of the below scenarios set forth in the EZ application:
Scenario No. 1:
Scenario No. 2:
The new Interim Final Rule provides that that SBA will issue further interim final rules relevant to loan forgiveness, loan review procedures and advance purchases of PPP loans. We will release additional alerts on these developments.
Pillsbury’s experienced, multidisciplinary COVID-19 Task Force is closely monitoring the global threat of COVID-19 and providing real-time advice across industry sectors, drawing on the firm’s capabilities in crisis management, employment law, insurance recovery, real estate, supply chain management, cybersecurity, corporate and contracts law and other areas to provide critical guidance to clients in an urgent and quickly evolving situation. For more thought leadership on this rapidly developing topic, please visit our COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Resource Center.