Alert
Alert
04.20.16
This alert also was published as a bylined article in Law360 on April 21, 2016.
Cultivation, production, distribution, or possession of marijuana is a federal criminal offense under the Controlled Substances Act (the CSA).1 Yet, despite federal prohibition, state-sanctioned marijuana industries have emerged and are continuing to develop and expand. The question is thus raised: How do we reconcile federal prohibition with a state’s legalization?
Decriminalization and the Rise of the Medical Marijuana Industry in California2
In 1996, California voters approved Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act, which, in pertinent part, decriminalized the cultivation and use of marijuana by seriously ill medical patients.3
In 2004, Senate Bill 420 (SB 420), the Medical Marijuana Program Act, became law. Among other things, SB 420 (1) required the California Department of Public Health to establish and maintain a statewide medical marijuana identification card program; (2) established possession and cultivation limitations and guidelines for qualified patients and their primary caregivers; and (3) extended decriminalization so qualified patients, persons with valid medical marijuana identification cards, and appropriate primary caregivers, may associate collectively or cooperatively within California on a non-profit basis only to cultivate marijuana for medical purposes.4
Following the passage of SB 420, certain local governments created ordinances authorizing medical marijuana dispensary permits. In 2007, the California Board of Equalization issued a Special Notice clarifying that medical marijuana sales were generally subject to sales tax, and businesses engaged in such transactions needed to possess a seller’s permit.5 Then, in 2008, the California Attorney General issued guidelines for “a properly organized and operated collective or cooperative that dispenses medical marijuana through a storefront….”6
The Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act (the MMRSA) became law January 1, 2016. The MMRSA is comprised of three pieces of legislation: Assembly Bill 243, Assembly Bill 266, and Senate Bill 643. Among other things, the MMRSA:
The Bureau and Local Jurisdiction
Before the new statewide system can operate and issue licenses, certain agencies, including the newly created Bureau, must establish rules and regulations. On February 4, 2016, Governor Jerry Brown appointed Lori Ajax, former Chief Deputy Director of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to head the Bureau. Chief Ajax’s immediate undertakings are to staff the Bureau and develop agency rules and regulations. Regarding the latter, Chief Ajax anticipates holding stakeholder meetings in the coming months for the purpose of gathering stakeholder input that the Bureau intends to use to draft its rules and regulations, which will be circulated for public comment before finalization.7 The Bureau and other licensing agencies, as well as industry stakeholders, are also in the unique position of designing regulations based on lessons learned from other states, such as Colorado and Washington, which have previously established their own licensing regimes. The Bureau anticipates developing regulations sometime before January 1, 2018.8
In the meantime, local governments are creating their own medical marijuana policies and regulations pertaining to whether and what type of commercial activities will be permitted within their jurisdictions. For the time being, local jurisdictions wield significant power over medical marijuana enterprises wishing to establish or expand their businesses. Businesses should be aware that once the various state agencies start issuing licenses, licenses will be prioritized for any facility or entity that can demonstrate that it was in operation and in good standing with the local jurisdiction in which its operates before January 1, 2016.9