We have extensive experience with WTO dispute settlement. We have assisted Mexico with respect to the following WTO disputes:
- United States – Measure Concerning the Importation, Marketing, and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products
- United States – Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements
- Mexico – Tax Measures On Soft Drinks And Other Beverages
- Mexico – Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services
- Mexico – Anti-Dumping Investigation of High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) from the United States
- Mexico – Customs Valuation of Imports, United States – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000
- One of our attorneys assisted India with the dispute India – Measures Concerning the Importation of Certain Agricultural Products.
-
International Investment Disputes Experience
-
As U.S. counsel to Mexico, Pillsbury has assisted in the defense of many investment arbitrations initiated against Mexico under the NAFTA’s investment chapter and bilateral investment treaties. Completed cases in which we have been involved include:
- Robert Azinian and Others v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/97/2) (NAFTA)
- Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1) (NAFTA)
- Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (Waste Management I) (Case No. ARB(AF)/98/2) (NAFTA)
- Marvin Feldman Karpa v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1) (NAFTA)
- Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2) (Mexico – Spain Bilateral Investment Treaty)
- Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (Waste Management II) Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3) (NAFTA)
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/02/1) (NAFTA)
- GAMI Investments, Inc. v. United Mexican States (UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, administered by ICSID) (NAFTA)
- International Thunderbird Corporation v. United Mexican States (UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, administered by ICSID) (NAFTA)
- Corn Products International, Inc. v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/04/1) (NAFTA)
- Gemplus, S.A., SLP, S.A. and Gemplus Industrial, S.A. de C.V. v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/04/3) (Mexico – France Bilateral Investment Treaty)
- Talsud, S.A. v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/04/4) (Mexico – Argentina Bilateral Investment Treaty)
- Archer Daniels Midland Company and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc. v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/04/5) (NAFTA)
- Bayview Irrigation District and others v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/05/1) (NAFTA)
- Cargill, Incorporated v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/05/2) (NAFTA)
- Abengoa v. United Mexican States (Case No. ARB(AF)/09/2 (Mexico - Spain Bilateral Investment Treaty)
- KBR v. United Mexican States (Case No. UNCT/14/1) (NAFTA)
- One of our partners represented the claimant in Ethyl Corporation v. Canada (NAFTA), an arbitration conducted under the UNCITRAL rules.